There’s my reasoning (mostly given to me by my friend, the professional videographer). mov files directly, but if you do much color grading and editing you’ll end up with a far inferior product than if you’d transcoded to an appropriate intermediate format. But to maintain optimal quality, transcoding for each step is necessary. Professionals will transcode for each step of the process, unless they shoot something at four o’ clock and they need to roll out a finished product by five o’ clock. Then there are delivery codecs which compress efficiently while maintaining visual quality. There are editing codecs (DNxHD, Matrox, Cineform) which create large files but which don’t lose much information during the color grading / editing processes. Thus, they’re excellent for capturing but terrible for playback. There are capture codecs (H.264, AVCHD, etc.). There are different codecs for different purposes. It’s fast, easy and free.Ī couple quick words (before I start) on why transcoding for editing is a good idea. This solution should be appropriate for anyone looking for an excellent intermediate format for editing in Sony Vegas or another non-linear video editing program (NLE). I’ve discovered a significantly simpler (and less time-consuming) solution (in my opinion) with the help of a professional videographer who prefers me not to use his name. The solution works, but it’s very cumbersome for the average user (no offense intended I’ve learned much from reading Eugenia’s blog).

mov files using the recently released Matrox codecs. I noticed on Eugenia’s blog that she discovered a way to trancode. Overall, that was a good solution (and still is) but I think I’ve found a solution I like more. mov files from a Canon t2i using Avid’s DNxHD codec. Not too long ago, I posted an article on how to transcode.

Matrox vfw software codecs sony vegas